Ocha Time

https://eur-lex.europa.eu › legal-content › EN › TXT
Case T 86 19 Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 SolNova v EUIPO Canina Pharma BIO INSECT Shocker EU

https://www.wipo.int › wipolex › en › judgments › details
Judgment of the General Court Ninth Chamber of 13 May 2020 SolNova AG v European Union Intellectual

https://infocuria.curia.europa.eu › tabs › redirect › juris › liste.jsf
This field allows you to search by an act of EU law cited in the grounds or operative part of reasoned opinions judgments or orders

https://www.wipo.int › wipolex › en › text
Judgment of the General Court Ninth Chamber of 13 May 2020 SolNova AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office

https://curia.europa.eu › juris › document › document.jsf
Thus the Court found that the presence of the word bio on biocidal products was sufficient to establish a sufficiently serious risk that

https://juristeca.com › eu › tribunal-de-justicia-union...
In that context the Board of Appeal noted that the English word shocker means something that shocks and that that meaning is

https://www.lexology.com › library › detail.aspx
Thus the presence of a term such as bio on the biocidal product has been deemed sufficient to pose a serious risk

https://alatis.eu › en › trademark-assessment...
The General Court of the European Union finally had to assess whether the trademarkmark BIO INSECT Shocker was invalid and

https://files.chemicalwatch.com
As illustrated in the Annex to this document more than two hundred authorisations for products with trade names containing bio